A- de 1995
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
✓Claimant Sequeda Ferrer Alvaro·Respondent Juzgado 8 Familia
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se declaró la nulidad procesal desde la providencia proferida por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de la referencia, toda vez que la Corte consideró se presentó una violación del debido proceso y del derecho constitucional de acceso a la justicia, al omitir la primera instancia del proceso de tutela.
En consecuencia, ordenó devolver el expediente a la mencionada Sala para que actué como es debido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- R E S U E L V E
- PRIMERO. DECLARAR LA NULIDAD PROCESAL en el presente asunto, a partir -inclusive - de la providencia de agosto 15 de 1995, proferida por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Barranquilla, por las razones expuestas en la presente providencia.
- SEGUNDO. DEVOLVER el presente expediente a la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Barranquilla, para que proceda de conformidad con lo expuesto en la parte considerativa de esta providencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.